Four blind men went to "see" an elephant.
One touched the elephant's leg, and said, "The elephant is like a pillar."
The second touched the trunk, and said, "The elephant is like a thick stick or club. "
The third touched the belly, and said, "The elephant is like a big jar."
The fourth touched the ears, and said, "The elephant is like a winnowing basket. "
So they began to argue with each other as to what an elephant was like.
A passer-by, seeing them quarreling, asked, "What are you arguing about? "
They told him everything, and begged him to settle the matter.
He said, "None of you has seen the elephant properly.
"The elephant is not like a pillar; its legs are like pillars.
"It is not like a thick stick or club; but its trunk is.
"It is not like a big water-vessel; its belly is like a water-vessel.
"It is not like a winnowing basket; its ears are like winnowing baskets.
The elephant is the combination of all these."
In the same manner those quarrel who have seen one aspect only of the Deity.
Notes:
This familiar story is told in many ways:
- the number of blind men may vary (I usually tell the story with six; the Buddha told a version with an indeterminate number, "all the men of Savatthi who were born blind"!);
- the "likeness" may change (in my version, the legs are tree-trunks, the trunk a snake, and so on); and
- the statement of the moral is variously worded.
But they all mean the same thing: Our vision is limited, and we tend to take our limited version as the whole story.
Even this parable has many manifestations; how much more so God?
There's a sweet version of the story in verse here. It follows closely the story as I tell it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave me a message; I can't wait to hear from you!